Stipulation of Settlement (HP 6086/2020)¶
Document: Stipulation of Settlement (HP 6086/2020)
Color: White | Icon: Paperclip | Page Count: TBD | Version: v1.0 | Updated: 2026-03-23
DocID: WEB-stipulation-source
URL Slug: /vol07-white/stipulation-of-settlement/
Layer: 3 -- Volume Entry Page
GUARDRAIL: ORIENTATION ONLY
This page provides navigation and counsel-facing orientation to the Stipulation of Settlement. It does not create new facts, calculations, or strategy.
- Facts trace to White Vol 07 (WT-106B and related tabs)
- Strategy lives in the Stipulation Release & Vacatur Strategy page
- Compliance analysis lives in WT-118
Primary Source Document
View Stipulation of Settlement (PDF) -- 12-page court-filed stipulation (HP 6086/2020, NYSCEF Doc #10).
PART A -- What This Document Is¶
The Stipulation of Settlement in HP 6086/2020 is the SO-ordered agreement between Christian Gray (Tenant-Petitioner) and American Package Company, Inc. (Owner-Respondent) that governs mold remediation at G21 (97 Green Street, Brooklyn). It was filed on NYSCEF as Doc #10 on June 29, 2021 and SO-ordered by J.H.C. (Jack Stoller, probable).
The stipulation contains 17 paragraphs covering remediation work requirements, expert verification procedures, forfeiture deadlines, a mutual release, and procedural terms. It also includes Exhibit 1 -- a 6-page scope of work with floor plan (dated December 8, 2020) containing 8 margin comments by Jack Glass (JG1-JG8) that are part of the court-filed document.
Why it matters: This is the single most-referenced court filing in the binder. Every volume cites it. It establishes the remediation obligations, the verification framework that was allegedly not followed, the forfeiture clause cited in the Motion to Restore proceedings, and the mutual release language that threatens pre-stipulation damage claims.
PART B -- Key Provisions (Orientation Summary)¶
These are the provisions most frequently cited across the binder. For full paragraph-by-paragraph documentation, see WT-106B.
| Provision | Paragraph | What It Does | Where It Matters |
|---|---|---|---|
| Remediation scope | 1 + Exhibit 1 | Defines the court-ordered work (10-item scope, gut demo of studios) | Blue Vol 05; WT-106; WT-108A |
| Expert verification | 4-5 | ALC reports first; Olmsted inspects within 5 days of delivery | WT-108; WT-109; WT-110 |
| Forfeiture clause | 5 | If Olmsted misses the inspection/testing deadline, petitioner forfeits the right to inspect/test and to restore or challenge ALC's report or remediation completion | WT-118; Orange B001 |
| Disagreement / restore | 7 | Either party may restore by motion if experts cannot agree on completion | WT-117 (Smith decision) |
| Restoration limitation | 9 | Proceeding may only be restored for stipulation compliance enforcement | Vacatur Strategy |
| Mutual release | 10 | Release of claims "contained in Petition from the beginning of the world through the date of this Stipulation" | Vacatur Strategy; SCC Cause 2 |
| Supersession / merger | 13 | All prior negotiations merged; no modification without signed writing | General contract interpretation |
PART C -- How Counsel Should Use This Page¶
If you need to read the stipulation text: Start with the PDF link above, then review WT-106B for the paragraph-by-paragraph factual summary.
If you need scope of work details: Go to WT-108A (standalone scope extract with task matrix and Glass margin notes) or WT-106 Section B.2 (verbatim transcription).
If you need compliance analysis: Go to WT-118 (paragraph-by-paragraph compliance timeline covering the full 2021-2023 performance window).
If you need the release / vacatur strategy: Go to the Stipulation Release & Vacatur Strategy page (Layer 2 -- Immediate Attention).
If you need the full docket history: Go to WT-117 (34-document NYSCEF docket analysis including the Smith decision).
PART D -- Related Documents¶
| Document | Tab / Page | Function |
|---|---|---|
| WT-106B | Vol 07 Tab 106B | Paragraph-by-paragraph factual summary of all 17 stipulation terms |
| WT-106 | Vol 07 Tab 106 | Scope comparison: court-ordered vs. executed work |
| WT-106A | Vol 07 Tab 106A | SERVPRO field incident video documentation |
| WT-108A | Vol 07 Tab 108A | Exhibit 1 scope of work extract (Dec 8, 2020) |
| WT-108 | Vol 07 Tab 108 | ALC Post-Remediation Verification (Jul 28, 2021) |
| WT-109 | Vol 07 Tab 109 | Olmsted response: non-completed scope items (Aug 18, 2022) |
| WT-110 | Vol 07 Tab 110 | Olmsted follow-up scope additions (Nov 7, 2022) |
| WT-117 | Vol 07 Tab 117 | HP 6086/2020 NYSCEF docket analysis (34 documents) |
| WT-118 | Vol 07 Tab 118 | Stipulation compliance timeline analysis |
| Vacatur Strategy | Orientation Layer 2 | Release defeat mechanisms and vacatur motion posture |
| SCC Cause 2 | Supreme Court Complaint | Breach of Contract -- The Stipulation |
| Purple T2 | Vol 08 | Stipulation performance / court integrity strategy track |
| Orange B001 | Vol 12 | Sandercock malpractice framework |
PART E -- Source Document¶
| Document | File |
|---|---|
| Stipulation of Settlement (Original PDF) | WT-106_Stipulation_of_Settlement_Original.pdf |
END -- Stipulation of Settlement (HP 6086/2020) -- Orientation v1.0