Transmittal 1 of 5 — Cover: Four Emails Arriving Today (September 4, 2026)¶
Version: v1.0 | Updated: 2026-09-04
This page archives, verbatim, email 1 of the five-email transmission sent to Pryor Cashman LLP on September 4, 2026, responsive to the firm's August 27, 2026 post-call requests in Christian Gray v. American Package Co., Inc. The as-sent body is reproduced below from the sent-mail record. The transmittal index carries the full set, the send sequence, and counsel's acknowledgment.
Send Metadata¶
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Date | September 4, 2026, 5:14:29 PM EDT |
| From | Christian Gray (Proton Mail) |
| To | Matthew A. Marcucci, Pryor Cashman LLP |
| Cc | Eric Sherman, Pryor Cashman LLP |
| Subject | Four emails arriving today — what each one is |
| Thread | Sent as a reply to Matt Marcucci's August 27, 2026, 4:07 PM post-call email, with the subject changed |
| Matter | HP 6086/2020; Index No. 506171/2021; Gray v. American Package Co., Inc. |
| As-sent source | Proton Mail sent-message export, MD5 24ef4a2e |
The text below is a faithful reading copy of the as-sent body; the sent-message file, including this body and the full quoted thread beneath it, is fingerprinted MD5 24ef4a2e.
As-Sent Body¶
Hi Matt,
Four emails follow this one within the hour, in the order below. The first three are the items from your August 27 email and our call; the fourth is one document I am adding. So you can triage them, here is what each is: 1. "Fraud claims record map — hyperlinks per count; Verified Petition attached." From the call: the fraud page with a direct link per count to its record in the binder, and the signed Order to Show Cause with the annexed Verified Petition, which you asked me to pull. Two questions on the Petition at the end. 2. "Supreme Court complaint — draft analysis, claims electables, and comparison matrix." From the call: the two pages for your lane-by-lane ruling on the draft complaint, plus the comparison matrix, the 2021 Sandercock complaint page, and one bank-fraud brief you asked about — five links. 3. "Signing circumstances — the June 2021 stipulation and release, my account with the record." Your August 27 ask, and the substantive one of the set. My account of the signing under the fourteen questions I framed from your email, each tied to the dated record, with the executed stipulation as I sent it on June 19, 2021 (both files), a one-page provenance note, and a four-page documentary supplement. If you read one thing first, read its question 6. 4. "Sandercock July 31, 2022 email re: the damages figures in the original complaint — five questions." The addition — this one you did not ask for, so it comes last. It is a single email from prior counsel about how she arrived at the figures in the 2021 complaint; I am sending it on its own so it is in front of you rather than buried, with five questions for whenever you get to it.
Each email stands on its own and can be read in any order.
Thank you.
Peace, Christian
Related Correspondence and Binder References¶
This transmittal set
- Five-Email Transmittal — Index (September 4, 2026)
- Transmittal 2 of 5 — Fraud claims record map — hyperlinks per count; Verified Petition attached
- Transmittal 3 of 5 — Supreme Court complaint — draft analysis, claims electables, and comparison matrix
- Transmittal 4 of 5 — Signing circumstances — the June 2021 stipulation and release, my account with the record
- Transmittal 5 of 5 — Sandercock July 31, 2022 email re: the damages figures in the original complaint — five questions
Originating request
END — Transmittal 1 of 5 — Cover: Four Emails Arriving Today (September 4, 2026) v1.0